The Evolution of Casteism: A Paradigm Shift in Modern Society
Introduction:
Casteism, a deeply rooted social issue in India, has experienced a significant transformation in modern times. Despite being humans facing common financial and personal struggles, individuals are often subjected to discrimination based on their caste. This article aims to explore the changing definition of casteism, particularly in contemporary society, shedding light on its implications and consequences.
Understanding Casteism:
Caste, in today’s context, refers to a hereditary surname or last name assigned at birth. Irrespective of an individual’s achievements, parental occupation, financial status, or living conditions, caste becomes an inherent part of their identity. This rigid categorization has perplexed many, including myself, as it raises questions about the need to marginalize individuals based on their perceived social status.
Traditions and Divisions:
Growing up, I gradually grasped the significance of caste and its influence on various aspects of life. The practice of preferring same-caste marriages, for instance, can be puzzling for those unfamiliar with the intricacies of casteism in India. The Indian government recognizes three broad categories for educational and employment purposes: Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).
Further divisions exist within castes, such as Baniyas (business-oriented individuals), Brahmins/Pandits (priests, scholars, and custodians of religious rituals and knowledge), Kshatriyas (traditionally belonging to the warrior or ruling class), and Shudras (historically occupying lower social strata and performing manual labor). These divisions, in many ways, were originally intended to create communities based on common occupations and shared cultural backgrounds. For example, members of the Baniya caste, engaged in various business pursuits, would have similar experiences and cultural practices, facilitating better understanding and cohesion within the community.
Modern Perspectives:
However, as history tends to repeat itself, caste has evolved beyond its mere designation as a surname. It has acquired a new dimension akin to a profession or field of expertise. Consider the example of a software engineer who may find compatibility and understanding with a partner from a similar background. Sharing the nuances of their work and routine becomes easier, as they possess mutual understanding and familiarity. This trend extends to other professions as well. Artists, for instance, often find a deep connection with fellow artists due to their shared understanding of the creative process, frequent travel, irregular working hours, and other specific challenges. Conversely, a doctor might struggle to connect with an artist due to a lack of common ground and an inherent difference in their professional lives.
Conclusion:
In today’s world, casteism has transitioned from a mere social categorization to a reflection of profession and shared experiences. While the original intent behind creating castes may have been to foster solidarity and understanding, it is essential to critically evaluate the consequences of such divisions in modern society. Moving forward, promoting inclusivity and embracing diversity should take precedence over perpetuating caste-based biases. Only through collective efforts can we create a society that values individuals for their abilities, character, and contributions rather than their caste or profession.
Let me know yout point of view in comment section. Your claps are really appreciated to help others find this article 😃 .
